Monday, April 14, 2008

Don't kiss your babies on the mouth!!

Hi people,

This is Knowledge here. The REAL DEAL.

I’m emailing you all some links that speak to people who kiss innocent babies and children on the mouth. Also here is a transcript from the Oprah show with Bob Woodruff

Links that discuss kissing little babies and small children on the mouth:

http://tinyurl.com/5qcedq

Bob Woodruff and his kissing games with his 10 year old daughter.

Folks, here is a link to a picture of Bobs daughter in the Oprah audience,

and the written text of her telling Oprah and the audience about this

KISSING game that this eleven year old played with her dad.

http://www2.oprah.com/tows/slide/200702/20070227/slide_20070227_284_104.jhtml

Now if this isn't some sick scatology, then what is!! :-((

Leave your children's mouths alone. Let them save them for their

future mates OK Cheek kissing is just as nice and a lot more natural

and less dangerous to the child.

Good GOD!

I watched Oprah yesterday, February 27, 2007, and I heard something that sent chills down

my back, and no one said anything about it.

Bob Woodruff was on the show talking about his experiences recovering

from his wounds he received in Iraq.

A few minutes into his being on the show, Oprah asked Bob's daughter

how she felt about her father after he returned home I believe.

This pretty long haired little eleven year old, told the audience that

she "played a kissing game with her father to see who could kiss the

longest.... "

Ugh I had this vision of this acne face scarred man kissing this

beautiful kid on the mouth for a few minutes. Now think about that for

a minute.

Do you think they were kissing on each other’s cheeks?

Those of you who saw the show should remember that part.

As a person who has a degree in Psychology, and who has continued

studying human behavior all of his life, I can tell you for certain it

is not a clean, ethical practice for adult men and women to be kissing

their children on the mouth.

Why do you think GOD gave kids such cute rosy cheeks? That's where my

family kissed me when I was little, and that's where I kiss little

girls and boys.

My mouth is reserved for my wife, or for my girlfriend.

Letting a small child get used to the taste of its parents mouth is

setting it up for sexual exploitation later on.

It is also a filthy practice to place small babies face down on moms

lap where they can smell the odors coming from her genital region.

Babies noses are highly sensitive to odors. That type of odor will

produce a curiosity in the child that will make it be sexually

attracted to its mother, or act out in a weird way.

Do not place a baby near your armpits when they are funky either. It

has the same effect. Those are natural sexually stimulating pheromones

that come out in the perspiration. they are designed by GOD to excite

other adults; not children.

I called Al Sharpton a few minutes to comment on why kids are becoming

so fat. When the black guy answered the phone, and I told him that

what we see today with fat kids is a direct result of parents trying

to be "friends" with their children instead of authority figures as

they should be.

If you give your child everything that it asks for

other than affection, it will be a monster when it grows up. It could

be a physical monster, or a mental monster. I also explained to him

that I thought it was a horrible idea for people to be kissing their

children on the lips. The dummy responded that as a married man with

two kids, he thought I had a terrible idea... Good Lord! Where are

people going with all of this sexual perversion stuff

Who in the hell started that anyway. I never saw parents doing that

when I grew up. My parents and all of my family kissed me on the cheek.

If someone did kiss me on the mouth you can bet my parents quietly told them not to do it again

Anyway, Bob Woodruff had better be careful. The law may be paying him

a visit for doing things to his daughter that he shouldn't be doing. I

didn't have much respect for him before. Now I don't have any at all.

http://www.rhythmism.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-42209.html

Early Childhood Tooth Decay

Early childhood tooth decay affects the teeth of babies and young

children.

Your baby's teeth can begin to decay from the first day they come in.

When a baby uses a bottle for long periods, especially during rest or

sleep times, cavities can develop.

Early childhood tooth decay most often starts behind the top front

teeth, which makes it hard to see. It then spreads to the front of the

teeth and may appear as a chalky white line around the neck of the

tooth. Decay can then spread to all the other teeth.

Fruit juice, sweetened tea, pop, breast milk, cow’s milk and formula

ALL contain sugars that can cause tooth decay. Water is a good choice

at bed and nap times and between regular feeding times.

At birth, babies do not have the bacteria that cause tooth decay.

These bacteria are passed from parents to babies through kissing and

sharing utensils, like spoons.

" The more bacteria the parents have in their mouths, the more

bacteria that will be passed onto the babies/children. This can

increase the risk of early childhood tooth decay. Therefore, if the

parents mouth is clean and free of disease, both the parent and the

baby will benefit."

http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/rr_guide_to_dental_health.html

A CHILD'S TOILET

1. Use a separate table for dressing a child, and on this keep nothing

but his clothes.

2. Swab out a child's ears and nose every morning with a bit of cotton

dipped in cold water.

3. For very young children it is better to put a little Vaseline in

the nose each morning.

4. Re sure to clean a child's ears each morning.

5. Do not kiss a child's mouth or touch it with your hands; this may

cause infection.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/field-alice/protect/ch21.html

Parenting Predicament: Kissing and Your Preschooler

http://parenting.families.com/blog/parenting-predicament-kissing-and-your-preschooler

Health 24 - Oral Health, Caring for your teeth

Bacteria are present in saliva and can therefore be easily transmitted

from parent to child during kissing and by sharing the same utensils.

...

www.health24.com/medical/Condition_centres/777-792-3000-3002,34452.asp

- 53k -

What causes fever blisters?

Herpes simplex virus is highly contagious when fever blisters are

present, and the virus frequently is spread by kissing. "Children

often become infected by contact with parents", siblings or other

close relatives who have fever blisters.

http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/health/fever-blister/fever-canker.html

Life & Culture : Ex Etiquette -- ContraCostaTimes.com

They co-parent two kids, ages 5 and 7, and when they exchange the

kids, they hug and kiss goodbye -- on the mouth. I'm having a problem

with this. ...

www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/living/columnists/ex_etiquette/ -

27k -

BBC - h2g2 - Cold sores aka Herpes Simplex

Herpes simplex begins as a group of small blisters at the site of

infection. ... Kissing, especially parents kissing their children2;

Sexual contact ...

www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A1048709 - 50k - Cached - Similar pages

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is where kids should be kissed:

DENTAL HEALTH | A Healthy Mouth - Oral health is a good start to ...

A smile on the face of a small child is a precious sight. ... The

memory of a--mother’s gentle kiss on our cheek--- is remembered

fondly. We depend on our mouth ...

www.familyhealthonline.ca/fho/dental/DH_healthymouth_FHa01.asp - 85k -

African American History

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American_history

http://www.telebay.com/7777

http://clyde.buildlastingsuccess.com

Friday, November 9, 2007

WERE THE FIRST JEWS SPOOKS?

WERE THE JEWS ORIGINALLY NEGROES?

EUROPEAN painters and sculptors by their use of white models to typify
*-J Biblical characters have falsified tremendously the physiognomy of
the ancient Jews. We are familiar with the scores of portraits offered
to us as Christ. But do good Christians ever stop to think what he
really looked like? Josephus, first century historian, described him
as dark skinned and simple in appearance, in the Halosis, suppressed
portion of his work.*

Solomon, too, is portrayed as a white man, though in the Songs
attributed to him he speaks of himself as "black but comely." After
visiting most of the leading galleries of Europe and America, the only
realistic painting of an Eastern crowd that I have ever seen is
"Christ and Barabbas" by Verlat in the Royal Museum of Antwerp where
the mob is clamoring for Barabbas in preference to Christ.

Solomon, too, is always painted white. The only picture I have ever
seen of him as a Negro was in a certain luxurious palace of Cytherea
in Paris.

Mention was made of the biblical theory that Negroes became black
because Noah, supposedly white, cursed the sons of Ham. But the
earliest Jews were in all probability, Negroes.

Abraham, their ancestor, is said to have come from Chaldea and the
ancient Chaldeans were black. "The Chal-dees," says Higgins, "were
originally Negroes." As was said, too, relics of prehistoric Negroes
have been discovered in this region.

It is even possible that the Jews originated, not in Asia, but in
Africa. Gerald Massey has advanced considerable argument in proof of
that theory.

Whatever was the original color of the Jews they lived for more than
four centuries among the Negroid Egyptians. Their supposed oppressor,
the Pharaoh, Mernepthah, shows marked Negroid traits.

Only seventy Jews went to Egypt, but according to the Bible, 600,000
men left it, which must have meant an additional two or three million
women and children. Since the Jews were slaves their women were
undoubtedly concubines of the Egyptians and must have produced mixed
offspring.

After more than three centuries of slavery almost every trace of the
first seventy Jews must have been lost, together with their culture.
Thus Jewish culture was Egyptian culture. For instance, the Egyptians
did not eat pork, and still do not eat it.

To get an idea what must have happened to only those seventy Jews,
think of what has happened to Negroes in the United States who came in
'See sources in "Nature Knows No Color-Line" p. 40.

92
SEX AND RACE
hundreds of thousands over a period of centuries and not all at once
as the Jews did in Egypt. The Negroes are so Americanized that were it
not for their color one would forget that they ever came from Africa.

The Falashas, or Black Jews of Ethiopia, are probably very ancient.
They claim lineal descent from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, call
themselves Beta-Israel (The Chosen People), and observe the passover.1

Tacitus (80 A.D.) says that many Romans of his time believed that the
Jews originated in Ethiopia, having left there to escape oppression
from Cepheus, the king. Whiston, translator of Josephus' History of
the Jews, asks with regard to this: "One would wonder how Tacitus or
any other heathen could suppose the African Ethiopians under Cepheus,
who are known to be blacks, could be the parents of the Jews, who are
known to be whites ?"2

But, as was said, the Negro Jews in Ethiopia are actually Jews.
More­over, it is only in the white men's lands that the Jews are
white, this being the result of intermixture with the whites. In the
black man's land they are black. If some Romans believed that the Jews
were of Ethiopian ancestry, there must certainly have been black Jews
in Rome. Negroes were very well known to the Romans.

Moses himself was black. In all likelihood he was the son of Pharaoh's
own daughter, which would account for his adoption and rearing for the
throne. The story of his finding in the bullrushes is so identical
with that told about Sargon, King of Babylon, who preceded him, that
to some it seems doubtful."3 Moreover, this finding a child in the
water is an old African tradition.

When Jehovah wished to give Moses a sign, so runs the famous legend,
he told him to put his hand into his bosom. The hand came out white,
proving that it could not have been white before. The miracle lay in
turning a black skin white, and turning it to black again. Hence the
perfect logic of the Mohammedan belief that Moses was a Negro.

As Sir T. W. Arnold says: "According to Mohammedan tradition Moses was
a black man as may be seen from the following passage in the Koran,
'Now draw thy hand close to thy side; it shall come forth white but
unhurt'— another sign (XX, 23). 'Then he drew forth his hand and lo!
it was white to the beholders. The nobles of Pharaoh said, "Verily
this is an expert enchanter." VII, 105-06).'"4


Similarly Suyuti tells: "A Negro who pretended to the gift of prophecy
was brought before al-Mamun (the Caliph) and said: 'I am Moses, the
son of Imram,' and al-Mamun said to him, 'Verily, Moses the son of
Imram

drew forth his hand from his bosom white, therefore, draw forth thy
hand white that I may believe thee.' "5

Turning to modern anthropology one finds confirming evidence. Ratzel
says: "The entire Semitic and Hamitic population of Africa has.. .a
mulatto character which extends to the Semites outside of Africa."6
Prof. Elliott Smith in "Human History," similarly states: "Every kind
of intermingling has taken place between the original groups of the
Negro, Hamitic and Semitic peoples."7

In the Sudan, Upper Egypt, and North Africa there are Jews whose color
and features are indistinguishable from Negroes. The Jews outside
Africa retain, large numbers of them, their Negroid traits.

Fishberg traces the physical resemblance between the white Jews and
the black ones. Speaking of the color prejudice among Jews in India he
says: "The white Jews keep aloof and do not associate with their
(black) co-religionists." Of the latter he says: "Such persons also
have a Jewish physiognomy, which is so specific that one would be
inclined to believe that they are of mixed blood, were they not so
cruelly maltreated by their white co-religionists and treated as black
Jews." They are kept at a respectable
« History of the Caliphs, (trans. H. S. Jarrett), p. 342. Calcutta,
1881. •History of Mankind. Vol. II, p. 246. i p. 143. London,
1934.




iFishberg, M., The Jew, pp. 117, 147-48; 120-134. London, 1911.
Nesfield, Brief View of the Caste System, para. 135. Massey, G. A.,
Book of the Beginnings, Vol. II, pt. 2. pp. 364-441. London, 1881.

2 Josephus' History of the Jews. Dissertation III, p. 923. London.
1841.
3 Jewish Encyclopedia. (See Moses).
4 The Preaching of Islam, p. 358. London. 1913
RACE-MIXING


94
SEX AND RACE
distance and not permitted to enter the synagogue of the whites, nor
do they bury their dead in the same cemetery.

Dr. Hans Guenther in his "Rassenkunde des Judischen Volkes," does the
same. His work is illustrated with portraits of Negroid Jews of Europe
and elsewhere. As was already said he compares a portrait of Abraham
Plattje, a Hottentot, with that of Benjamin Disraeli, Jewish Prime
Minister of England.8 The resemblance is striking. Guenther,
it is said, did this

to depreciate the Jew but since we do not concede that Negro ancestry
is a disgrace we cannot consider that Guenther's alleged aim has
been achieved.

Count Adam Gurowski of Poland, who visited the United States in 1857,
said similarly, "Numbers of Jews- have the greatest resemblance to the
American mulattoes. Sallow carnation complexion, thick lips, crisped
black hair. Of all the Jewish population scattered over the globe
one-fourth dwells in Poland. I 'am, therefore, well acquainted with
their features. On my arrival in this country (The United States) I
took every light-colored mulatto for a Jew."9

Measurements of the skulls of Polish Jews in Whitechapel, London,
revealed that about 30 per cent of them were Negroid.10

The Negro strain is apparent among a considerable number of American
Jews. Some Jewish women go to Negro hair-dressing parlors to have
their hair straightened. The Island of Jamaica has a considerable
number of mulatto Jews, also.


8 pp. 90-95, 99-115, 143-148. Munich, 1930.
9 America and Europe, p. 177. N. Y., 1857.
10 Man, Vols. 5:6. No. 55, p. 93. Additional Bibliography:
Williams, J. J. Hebrewisms of West Africa. N. Y., 1930. Wheless, J. Is
it God's Word? N. Y., 1926. Wheless, J. Forgery in Christianity. N.
Y., 1930. Scribner's Maga Apr., May, June, July, 1929, for West
African Jews. Additional data and sources in Rogers, J. A. Nature
Knows No Color Line, pp. 122, 130, 140-142.

RACE-MIXING UNDER ISLAM!

ImHotep,

If you are desirous of more mind boggling information on these and
other subjects similar to this, email me and we can work out a way to
get you this KNOWLEDGE.

All of this accurate information comes from books that have been
banned, and are very difficult to obtain. The Caucasian world does not
want anyone to know the truth about who and how the world was
populated.

Chapter Ten
RACE-MIXING UNDER ISLAM

ONE fact about Islam stands glowingly forth through the centuries: Its
almost total freedom from race and class prejudice; the opportunity it
gave to every capable and aspiring follower, regardless of color or
social status, to rise to the highest possible rank.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Slaves rose to be sultans, and slave women to be favorites of the
ruler, and mothers of heirs to the throne. At times the slave,
himself, became a master while still enslaved and held freeborn men of
wealth and power in dread of him.


Christianity, which too, was an Oriental religion, had begun with the
same broadmindedness. "Of one blood," said St Paul, "God made all the
races of the earth." Race distinctions were unknown in early
Christianity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first great leaders of Christianity, next to St. Paul, were all
born in parts of Africa where Negro strain was abundant in the
population, and were very likely Negroes themselves.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is true of St. Augustine, Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, and
Clement of Alexandria. Tertullian and St. Athanasius (296-373 A.D.),
for whom the Athanasian Creed is named, are definitely said to have
been Negroes. Nevertheless, Christianity was not long in developing
class differences in addition to slavery and after the discovery of
the New World color prejudice too.

Of What Race Was Mohamet?
Mohamet, the founder of Islam, was an Arab. What is an Arab?
The Encyclopedia Britannica (11th edition) says of Arabia's present
inhabitants, "Arabia has a considerable free black population and
there again by intermarriage with the whites around have filled the
land with a mulatto breed of every shade till in the eastern and
southern provinces especially a white skin is almost an exception.

In Arabia no prejudice exists against Negro alliances; no social or
political line separates the African from the Arab."

There is every reason to believe that the above picture has been true
of Arabia for the past several thousand years. Arabia is but an
extension of Africa where black people from the southwest, and white,
or nearly white people, from the northwest met to mingle their
cultures and their blood.
Mohamet, himself, was to all accounts a Negro. A contemporary of his
describes him as "large-mouthed," and "bluish-coloured, with hair that
was
95

96
SEX AND RACE
neither straight nor curly,"1* that is, hair that was probably frizzly
like that of the "Fuzzy-Wuzzy." "Bluish," also, happens to be the
precise color of certain very Negroid natives of the Sudan. Mohamet's
mother was also African. His grandfather, Abd el Mottalib, is spoken
of as being "very dark." He might have been a slave, "Abd" or "aabd"
originally meant "slave." Therefore when Dermenghamlb says that the
Negro strain "seemed scarcely perceptible,"in Mohamet, he is evidently
wrong.


Most of Mohamet's first disciples were Negro slaves. His second
convert and closest and most honored friend until his death was Bilal,
an Ethiopian ex-slave. Mohamet thought so highly of Bilal that he gave
him precedence over himself in Paradise. Mohamet also adopted as his
own son, another Negro, Zayd bin Harith, his third convert, who rose
to be one of his greatest generals.2 Later, to show his regard for
Zayd, he took one of Zayd's wives, the beautiful Zainab, as his own.

One of Mohamet's earliest injunctions was, "Variety of your languages
and of your complexions, verily herein are signs unto men of
understanding." (Koran XXX, 21).

Of course, the mere issuance of this injunction is proof that there
must have been some prejudice against color. In fact, wherever
differences of color exist, there are certain preferences, mostly
sexual, which like anything else in creation can be expanded into a
fetish over which human beings can be made to fight.

Hollywood, for instance, gives the preference to blondes; and
gentlemen, we are told, prefer blondes. It must be rather irritating
for a brunette beauty to find herself rejected by a movie director,
because her skin and hair are not whiter.

Arabia, in Mohamet's time, was, even as it now is, a mulatto land.
These mulattoes considered themselves superior, but not very seriously
so to both the "pure" whites and the "pure" blacks. This trait was not
local, nor is it entirely of the past. Certain old mulatto families of
the West Indies, West Africa, and Ethiopia still feel the same towards
whites and blacks.

The Arab considered a white skin inferior; perhaps one had better say
he had a certain repulsion for it such as exists today nearly over all
Africa and South­ern Asia because of its unfamiliarity.

Gobineau says that Mohamet was too near divinity "to show a white
skin" to his followers. Professor Toynbee says also, "The Primitive
Arabs who were the ruling element of the Umayyad Caliphate called
themselves 'the swarthy people' with a connotation of racial
superiority and their Persian and Turkish subjects 'the ruddy people'
with a connotation of racial inferiority, that is to say, they drew
the distinction that we draw between blonds and brunets but reversed
the values."3
*» Margoliouth, D. S. Mohammed, p. 63. London, 1927. lb
Dermengham. Life of Mohamet, p. 5. London, 1930. 2 Islamic
Review. Vol. 20, p. 220. June-July, 1932. » A Study of History.
Vol. I, p. 226. London, 1934.

RACE-MIXING UNDER ISLAM
97
This feeling of superiority on the part of a mixed race was probably
heightened by the very low culture of the Nordics of that time.
Draper, writing of the eleventh century, speaks of the vastly superior
social and artistic development of the swarthy Moors, who, he says,
might well have looked "with supercilious contempt on the dwellings of
the rulers of Germany, France, and England, which were scarce better
than stables—chimneyless, windowless, and with a hole in the roof for
the smoke to escape like the wigwams of certain Indians."4


The Zenghs, or Zends, the very black natives of Africa, who were
imported in great numbers as slaves, were looked down on too, probably
for the same reason. A work by Al-Jahiz, a Negro writer, whom
Christopher Dawson calls "the greatest scholar and stylist of the
Ninth Century,"5 leaves little doubt of that. This book is entitled
Kitab al Sudan wa 'l-Bidan, or "The Superiority in Glory of the Black
Race Over the White," a title that speaks for itself. "White" here, be
it noted, does not mean the fair whites, but dark-skinned whites and
mulattoes.

In parts of the East, as in Ethiopia, the fair white is called "the
red man." Moreover, Jahiz in his essay includes the East Indians among
the blacks—a people which many modern ethnolo­gists claim as white.

Another writer of that time, Masudi, has written at length of these
primitive blacks.6
The latter were treated so badly by their masters, some of whom were
native-born blacks, that they rose in what was undoubtedly the
greatest slave rebellion in history, including even that of Haiti,
Under their leader, Al Burkhui, (The Veiled Prophet), they seized
Bagdad, the capital of the world's then mightiest empire, and held it
for thirteen years (870-883 A.D.).

The Zenghs killed more than half a million of their oppressors, an
enormous number for that day. Cutting off the heads of their masters
they would toss the heads in the canals of the Tigris and let them
drift down the stream to anxious relatives waiting to see who were the
next.7

Several passages in Arabian literature also reveal a certain prejudice
against the pure blacks. In the great Arabian sex classic, Er Roud el
aater fi nezaha el khater, (The Perfumed Garden), the remarks of the
Caliph when he witnesses the sexual prowess of the Negro, Al Durgham,
and his careful inquiry into the cause of his powers, leave little
doubt of that.8

Also, the
4 Intellectual Development of Europe, p. 348. N. Y., 1863.
»The Making of Europe, p. 152. N, Y„ 1932. Hitti. P. K. History
of the Arabs, p. 382. London, 1937.
6Les Prairies d'Or. (trans. C. Barbier de Meynard), Vol. I, pp.
163-67; Vol. Ill, chap. 33. Paris, 1863.
7 Hitti, P. K. Ibid, pp. 467-68.
8Nefzawi. Le Jardin Parfume. History of the Negro, Doreramus, pp.
44-72. Paris, 1927.

100
SEX AND RACE
poet, An-Nami, when mocked about his gray hairs by another, who said
that An-Nami had but a single black hair in his head, replied, "A dark
African spouse will not remain long in the house where the second wife
is white." (Note that "white" in the East, as in Brazil, is sometimes
dark mulatto).

Abu Ishak, a poet, who wrote much in favor of his black slave, Yumn,
also says, "The dark-skinned Yumn said to one whose colour equalled
the whiteness of the eye, "Why should your face boast of its clear
complexion? Do you think that by so clear a tint it gains additional
merit? Were a mole of my colour on that face it would adorn it, but
one of your coloui on my cheek would disfigure it.' "9

Two of the greatest of all Oriental rulers, Antar and Kafur, both
suffered from color prejudice at first. Antar, who was the son of an
Ethi­opian slave, was despised by the Bedouins, themselves a Negroid
people, because of his blackness. Antar is the greatest chivalrous
figure of the East and one of the world's great poets.10

Kafur, "a Negro of deep-black color with a smooth shining skin," who
had been brought out of the Sudan as a slave, and who later rose to be
ruler of Egypt and Syria, was at first mocked by his fellow-slaves,
and called "the moon of darkness' by the celebrated poet,
Al-Muttanabi.11

The phrase, "black but comely" which is said to be a correct
translation, also shows some objection to black. Some of this feeling
still exists in the East. I recall seeing once in Cairo a very black
man with short woolly hair but with an almost Grecian profile. The
type being unfamiliar to me, I asked my companion, a Bedouin, who was
at least three-fourths Negro, himself, whether the man was an
Egyptian. "No/' he replied, "that's what they call a nigger." He said
that his father had people like him as slaves but added quickly that
they were treated very kindly.

This prejudice against unmixed white and unmixed black has long
existed in Ethopia also.12 Count Gleichen correctly said that the
Ethiopian "hates a white man" and is anxious to keep him out of his
country.

The Amhara, who, in general, show more of the Negro than the average
Afra-merican, look down upon the Chankalla, or primitive black. But
this is largely true only of the first generation.

Numbers of leading Ethiopians show a marked Chankalla strain. The
great Emperor Menelik, who was coal-black, came of this stock. His
mother, Edgig-aiehou, was a Chankalla slave. In Egypt, too, these
black Negroes, some of them with their tribal
8 Ibn Khallikan. Biographical Dictionary, (trans. MacGuckin de Slane),
Vol. I, pp. 32, 111. Paris, 1842-71.
10 Hamilton, T. Antar. 4 vols. London, 1880. Also Biographie
Universelle
n Ibn Khallikan. Biographical Dictionary (McGuckin de Slane), Vol. II,
pp. 524 et seq. Paris. 1842.
12 Ludolphus. History of Ethiopia. Book I, chap. 14. London,
1682.

RACE-MIXING UNDER ISLAM
101
markings, hold high rank in the Egyptian army. The chamberlain of the
late King Fouad was a black, Sammi Bey, while the prime minister,
Nahas Pasha, was a mulatto. In short, the prejudice in the East cannot
be explained in terms of the American one. It is cultural rather than
chromatic. The nearest thing to it, I know, is the prejudice the
Northern Negro entertains for most of the Southern ones.

Color, then, was no serious bar under Islam, or in the East, from the
earliest times. Several of the rulers of the Mohammedan Empire, at the
height of its glory were not only mulattoes, but blacks. Such a one
was Ibrahim al-Mahdi, Islam's most renowned singer, and the
half-brother of Haroun Al-Raschid of Arabian Nights' fame. Ibrahim
calls himself "a Negro" in his autobiography.

So does his uncle and rival for the throne, Mamoun the Great.
Ibrahim's mother was the daughter of a Persian king.
Ibn Khallikan, Arab historian of the thirteenth century, says of
Ibrahim, "Being of dark complexion which he inherited from his mother,
Shikla or Shakla, who was a Negro, he received the name of
At-Thinnin—the Dragon (due to his size and the blackness of his skin)
— He was proclaimed Caliph at Bagdad.. .under the title of Al Mubarak
(The Blessed)."13 At least two of the other caliphs, Al Muktafi and
Rachid, had Negro mothers, accord­ing to Suyuti.

The renowned Kafur, ruler of Egypt, was a thick-lipped Negro slave of
Chankalla birth; Haroun Al-Raschid made Khusabeb, another Negro
ex-slave, ruler of Egypt.14 Mahmud of Ghazni, greatest of the Islamic
con­querors, was the son of a slave.

The Mamelukes, some of whom were white slaves from the Russian
Caucasus, and some of whom were Negro slaves from the Sudan, ruled
Egypt for three centuries (1250-1517), and held great power when
Napoleon invaded Egypt. Moslem India, also, has had many great rulers
of Negro descent, one of whom was Malik Ambar,15 a Negro ex-slave, who
ruled in Bombay; and Malik Andeel, another Negro ex-slave who ruled in
Bengal.16

The Nawabs, or Nabobs, great Moslem princes of India, are originally
of Ethiopian Negro stock.17 They enjoyed great power until the
beginning of the nineteenth century.


Negro Ranked First in Sexual Competence
As regards sex relations, the real index to prejudice, there was
little ill-will either. Black men, some of whom were eunuchs, had
sometimes great harems with women of many races. One of these
latter, Sunbullu (The
is Ibn Khallikan. Ibid, Vol. I, p. 17.
"Sadi. Gulistan (ed. Sir Edward Arnold), pp. 80-1. N. Y., 1899.
is See 40.
16 See 41.
" Morie, L. J. Histoire de l'Ethiopie, Vol. II, p. 33. Paris,
1904.

RACE-MIXING UNDER ISLAM
105
In a footnote to the second story in which the master's daughter gives
herself to a Negro, Burton says, "This familiarity with blackamoor
slave-boys is common in the East and often ends as in the story.

"In my time no honest Hindi-Moslem would take his women-folk to
Zanzibar on account of the huge attraction and enormous temptation
there and thereby offered to them." (Burton, here refers to the
muscular black men, wandering nude on the streets.)19

Napoleon on Race-Mixing in the East
When Napoleon invaded Egypt in 1798 and saw how the different colors
of mankind lived in harmony under Islam, while in Christian Haiti,
whites, mulattoes, and blacks were at one another's throats in a
three-cornered war, he was so impressed that he tried to introduce
legal race-mixing in Haiti. He said,
"These countries were inhabited by men of different colors. Polygamy
is the simple way of preventing them from persecuting one another. The
legislators have thought that in order that the whites be not enemies
of the blacks, the blacks of the whites, the copper-colored of the one
and the other, it was necessary to make them all members of the same
family and struggle thus against a penchant of man to hate all that is
not like him.

Mohamet thought that four women were sufficient to attain this goal
because each man could have one white, one black, one copper-colored,
and one wife of another color...

"When one wishes to give liberty to the blacks in the colonies of
America and establish a perfect equality, the legislator will
authorise polygamy and permit at the same time a white wife, a black
one, and a mulatto one. Then the different colors making part of the
same family will be mixed in the opinion of each. Without that one
would never obtain satisfactory results. The blacks would be more
nurgerous and clever and they would hold the whites in abasement and
vice versa.


"Because of the general principle of equality that polygamy has
estab­lished in the East there is no difference between the
individuals composing the house of the Mamelukes. A black slave that a
bey had bought from an African caravan became katchef and was the
equal of a fine white Mameluk, native of Circassia; there was no
thought even of having it otherwise.
"Slavery has never been in the Orient what it was in Europe.

The customs in this respect have remained the same as in the Holy
Scriptures: the servant marries with the master. In Europe, on the
contrary, whoever bore the imprint of the seal of slavery remained
always in the last rank.. ."20
"Vol. I. pp. 1-16 6. 71: Vol. II. p. 49: Vol. IV, pp. 245-60, 253,
278. *>Memoires. Vol. III. pp. 152-54. 259-76. Paris. 1904.

108
SEX AND RACE
In short, the Negro, was discriminated against in no phase of
Moham­medan life on the ground of color alone. Islam was the greatest
and freest of all great melting pots.
And it carried race-mixing throughout the length and breadth of what
was the vastest empire the world has ever known. At the height of its
power Islam stretched from the centre of France south to the
Mediterranean and along both shores of this sea to the Levant and from
thence to India, China, and the islands of the Pacific, as well as
into Asiatic Russia.

The sultans in this vast area were of all colors from blond to
coal-black and wives of all colors were to be found in their harems.
White captives of both sexes were taken from Europe and scattered over
North Africa and Asia and black captives of both sexes were carried
into Europe and Asia. Differences of color among the Mohammedans came
in time to count for almost as little as the different colors of
flowers in a garden does to the flowers themselves.

A Negroid strain, more or less predominant, ran through the whole. As
Keane says, "All who accepted the Koran became merged with the
conquerors in a common Negroid population."21

It was this empire founded by the black Mohamet with the help of
brown, yellow and white mongrels that aroused proud Europe from the
slumber of the Dark Ages, and laid the foundations of its present
culture. It was the great Arab chemists, architects, mathematicians,
physicians, and experimental scientists to whom we are largely
indebted for modern science.

Go to any part of the Mohammedan world—to India, Indo-China, Egypt,
Morocco, Spain—and you will behold art whose beauty mankind seems to
have lost the conception of. Near to the Alhambra, for instance, is a
struc­ture erected by the architects of the Emperor Charles V of Spain
and Ger­many. Compared with the superb beauty of the Alhambra the
latter, is to say the least, crude and clumsy.

It was the Arabs, too, who gave to Europe her present system of
numer­als, which they, in turn, had taken from the Hindus. Match this
Arabic or Hindu numeral, against the tedious and cumbersome Roman
letter-numerals! No wonder Nietzsche raged in anger when he thought of
how the Moors who had done so much for European civilization had been
driven out like dogs by the Christians.

Race-mixing, as we thus see, has been one of the functions of empire.
Egypt, Persia, Macedonia, Rome, brought hordes of whites, browns, and
blacks and amalgamated them. All great empires seem, to begin with
race-mixing, and die when they become too pure. The races that are
furthest down are the purest ones, as the Veddahs of Ceylon, the
Andaman Islanders, the Pigmies, and the Semangs. The mixed ones are
the furthest up. What 21 Man, Past and Present, p. 64. Cambridge,
1920.

110 SEXANDRACE
land is more mixed than the United States, which is now at the top ?
America, as we shall show in Volume Two, is more vastly mixed than the
average person imagines. The race-purists usually shut their eyes to
this fact. Petrie showed how repeated Ethiopian invasions brought new
life to Egypt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A pure race may be compared to standing water; a mixed race, to
running water. The former soon becomes stagnant; the latter by running
purifies itself. Nature knows her business. She is wiser than all
in this respect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Egypt Today
The color pattern of the Egyptian population today may be summed up as
follows: In Alexandria and the Delta rather more white than black due
to European immigration; at Cairo, there is also a large European
popu­lation but the native population is mulatto, and shades off
towards dark mulatto; at Thebes, it is predominantly dark mulatto with
a large proportion of blacks; and in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, it is
far more black than mulatto with only a sprinkling of whites, mostly
Europeans.

Some of these blacks haven't the broad features of the average West
African black, but their hair is woolly. Some of the jet-black,
woolly-haired Negroes, as the so-called Fuzzy-Wuzzies, have Grecian
profiles.

A Levantine strain is also apparent in certain of the population. In
short, this black population s very highly mixed.

The people of Southern Persia are still largely Negroid. Some are pure
Negroes, like the Bombassi. The Susians in the lower valley of the
Euphrates are also strongly Negroid. In all this region of the Near
East the supply of "pure" Negroes was kept up by the slave trade and
the re­cruiting of black women for the harems, which still goes on.
Negroes in this latter region also marry white women.

WWW.TELEBAY.COM/7777

Friday, October 5, 2007

Michelle Obama, feminism and the strong black woman

I've been following the media's handling of race in its coverage of Barack Obama's presidential bid very closely over the last few months. But right now I'm particularly interested by the media coverage of his wife, Michelle Obama. Race, gender, and feminism are intersecting in fascinating ways. Here are some highlights.

Maureen Dowd has criticized Michelle Obama's light-hearted comments about her husband being "just a man" and not knowing how to put his socks in the laundry. Dowd felt that these remarks were "emasculating":

how do you feel about her statements and about Michelle in general?

Sunday, July 1, 2007

How Educated are your favourite Hollywood Stars

How Educated are your favourite Hollywood Stars

Onscreen, Legally Blonde's Reese Witherspoon is a Harvard-educated lawyer. Offscreen? She's a college dropout.

In most professions, that might be a problem. But life is different in Tinseltown. Of the 20 best-paid actors and actresses on Forbes Most Powerful Celebrities list, who collectively raked in $529 million over the course of the year, only two--Adam Sandler and Cate Blanchett--have a college degree. Witherspoon? She earned $7 million last year.

But for non-actors on our list, it's a different story. For these authors, directors and talking heads, a college education proves far more common. For these folks, communications, broadcasting and psychology have been among the more popular majors. Among the high-profile grads: Oprah Winfrey, Steven Spielberg and Donald Trump hold degrees in speech, film and economics, respectively.
There's a simple reason for this, argues James Houran, a clinical psychologist who researches celebrity worship. A college education is an increasingly unnecessary item on celebrity résumés, and may actually be a liability. Rather than rely on skills and ability, as stars once did to get noticed, he says there exists a trivialized process by which celebrities are made today. The way Houran sees it, reaching stardom now has less to do with who has the best skills or ability than who has the best marketer or promoter. And taking time for college risks disrupting that process.

So while the absence of a degree is hardly a new phenomenon in Hollywood--bold-faced names like George Clooney, Angelina Jolie and Tom Cruise never donned a tassel--it is even less of a priority for today's rising stars. Among the newest cadre of degree-impaired celebrities: Jessica Simpson, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan.
"They’re earning fantastic sums by the time they’re teenagers, so the obvious question, no matter how smart they are, is why take time off to go to school?" says Tyler Cowen, author of What Price Fame?. "You can always go later--not that most of them do."

That lack of experience can be damaging as stars age, however, says David Haven Blake, author of the recently published Walt Whitman and the Culture of American Celebrity. His fear: These are people who have doggedly pursued a single goal without ever developing the kind of critical perspective that will help them face challenges later in life. "They are like mountain climbers so eager to reach the summit," he says, "that they never stop to fill their canteens on the way."

And what about society’s youth that strives desperately to emulate Hollywood’s stars? Will the non-educated A-list serve as poor role models?

The answer, according to Cowen, is no, because whether or not celebrities have attended college is rarely known, much less discussed. Simply put: Reality isn't important. For fans, an actor playing an English major on television has more impact than an actor being an English major in real life. And when people want motivation from a celebrity, they focus on the qualities that they'd like to emulate and pitch the rest. "People tend to use role models for their own purposes," he says.
For the stars, the lack of a traditional college experience may not be such a bad thing, says Cowen. Always treated like royalty, celebrities wouldn't get to learn from and enjoy the typical college experience anyhow. Consider Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen, stalked by the paparazzi during their undergrad days at New York University. Normalcy? Hardly. The twin starlets eventually dropped out. So if the goal is simply to learn, Cowen says private tutors would likely prove more effective.
"A lot of school is about developing alliances, contacts and a self image," he says, "and if you're a movie star, you don't really need those things."
Source - Forbes

Labels: adam sandler, angelina jolie, cate blanchett, donald trump, forbes, george clooney, jessica simpson, lindsay lohan, oprah winfrey, paris hilton, reese witherspoon, steven spielberg, tom cruise
]

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Marrying your cousin

Marrying your cousin
published: Sunday | April 1, 222,007

FYI
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070401/out/out4.html

Heather Little-White, Ph.D., Contributor

What is the deal for marrying your cousin when several other eligible partners are around? It has always been said that marrying a member of your family could be considered incestuous and an impediment to marriage. However, some persons are a little more lenient in their condemnation of the marriage between cousins, especially distant cousins.

Cousin marriages are often discouraged because of the belief that marrying blood relatives could lead to birth defects in the child. One broad definition of family is a group of two or more people related by marriage, blood relation, or adoption.

In Jamaica, there were some who gave their blessing to cousins marrying, and described in Jamaican parlance the 'cousin and cousin mek good soup'. Janetand Raymondare two cousins who have been married for 10 years and have three healthy boys. It was only two weeks before the wedding that the couple learned that they were related. Janet, born in St. Ann, is a teacher who went to do practise teaching in St. Thomas when she met Raymond, an agriculturalist, born and bred in St. Thomas.

Their meeting was love at first sight and Janet never returned to St. Ann to live. Janet's mother came from England for the wedding of her only daughter, and when she heard of the surname of Raymond's family, she started to trace her family tree. It was then she discovered that Janet and Raymond were second cousins. Initially, the thought was a little repulsive for Janet, who harboured the fear of birth defects in her children, but with counselling from her doctor and pastor, the wedding was not cancelled.

Jamaican law

Jamaican law does not prohibit cousins from entering into sexual unions with each other. A Gleaner article on Monday, March 19, reported "Kinder law of 'Kissing Cousins'" as a result of the decision by a joint select committee of Parliament not to include unions of cousins in the definition of prohibited incestuous relationships. Inter-marriage of cousins is a practice that has been around for ages and has existed across cultures. In West African francophone countries, a common saying is 'cousins are made for cousins', writes a Peace Corps volunteer in Mauritania. (www.straightdope.com).

European countries permit marriage among cousins, and in parts of Africa and Asia marriages between cousins are preferred and, as such, are arranged by older family members and friends. In several countries, cross-cousin marriages occupy a significant place in traditional matrimonial alliances. It is believed that these marriages will help siblings separated by marriage to regain contact if their children intermarry and demonstrate sibling solidarity.

Loyalty

In the Middle East, cousin marriages create a clan of fierce internal cohesiveness and unity, and are like miniature governments providing the services and social aid that western countries would receive from the local and national governments. It is this kind of loyalty and cohesiveness of inter-clan unions in Iraq which has undermined the strength of the Americans in the current war, according to Anne Bobroff-Hajal, writing in the December 2006 issue of the Christian Science Monitor in an article titled 'Clan loyalty fixed by cousin marriage was always bound to undermine democracy in Iraq'.

However, in general, geneticists believe that there is nothing wrong with in-cousin marriages or in-marrying into a small genetic pool. A New York Times article by Denise Grady (2002) writes that contrary to the age-old myth and taboos of many Americans, first cousins can have children without the risk of birth defects. A panel of researchers convened by National Society of Genetic Counsellors concluded that the general risks for life were not high, and questioned the right of other people to have children even though they have far higher risks than first cousins. High risk persons include those with Huntington's disease and haemophilia.

Outlawed

The United States of America is one of few developed nations outlawing marriage among first countries. The practice is illegal in 31 states, and some will allow it if there are no plans for procreation, for fear of producing babies with congenital defects, such as spina bifida or cystic fibrosis. Anthropologist, Martin Ottenheimer, believes that the U.S. is still holding on to the flawed 19th century research which exaggerated the dangers of mental illness, blindness and deformity among children of close relatives.

A new study published in the September issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics claimed that physicians were close to a pre-natal diagnosis of a rare genetic disorder called Joubert syndrome. This condition affects that area of the brain responsible for controlling balance and coordination. Principal researcher, Joseph Gleeson, M.D., of the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, added that the search is still on to know the exact genes involved because the population of intermarrieds is relatively small. The focus has been on three Middle Eastern families whose relatives had intermarried and passed the genetic defect to several family members.

It is no April Fool's Day joke. The marriage of cousins around the world is taking on new dimensions and is of interest to researchers in medical schools, ethicists and genetic interest groups.

Caste discrimination a worldwide problem for all black people and collective resistance is needed to defeat it

FYI

http://tinyurl.com/yc9zp3


Few people are aware that India’s 160 million untouchables or Dalits are descendants of Africans who once ruled the Indus Valley. But caste discrimination affects all black people, who are regarded as untouchables, even in the US and UK.

It may seem ironic to many that India’s untouchable castes known as Dalits, who are despised and condemned in Hindu scriptures for the colour of their skin and who are oppressed and exploited are distant relations to Africans, who were dehumanised in order to justify their enslavement to enrich the West.

But two papers published by African scholar and physicist Cheikh Anta Diop in 1955 and 1967 were translated from French to English and published as : The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality in 1974. In this book, as well as establishing the African origins of Egypt, Diop also revealed that Africans known as Dravidians created the Indus Valley civilization.

Dravidians are a linguistic group under which many different groups fall, but many scholars aside from Diop, including: Chiek Tidiane N Diave, S R Santharam and U.Pupadhyaya Susheela O.Uphadyaya, have found both linguistic and cultural links between Dravidians and Africans.

Diop wrote: “…The Indo-Europeans never created a civilization in their own native lands: the Eurasian plains. The civilizations attributed to them are inevitably located in the heart of Negro countries in the southern part of the northern hemisphere: Egypt, Arabia, Phoenicia, Mesopotamia, Elam, India. In all those lands there were negro civilizations when the Indo-Europeans arrived as rough nomads during the second millennium.”

Diop described Dravidians as a type of the black race with: “Black skin, often exceptionally black, with straight hair, aquiline nose, thin lips, an acute cheekbone angle. We find a prototype of this race in India: the Dravidian.”

But the real irony of the caste system is that is that it is a corruption of a social system invented by the early African civilizations, according to a 19th century French anthropologist called Francois Lenormant, whom Diop refers to in his book: “The Aryas of India…adopted it, borrowed it from the Kushite populations.”

Today, the descendants of the Dravidians live under the scourge of what is often referred to as: “India’s hidden apartheid.” In a 1999 report by Human Rights Watch called: Broken People: Caste Violence Against India’s Untouchables , the extent to which the caste system affects the lives of a population almost three times the size of the UK was revealed:

“Untouchables may not cross the line dividing their part of the village from that occupied by higher castes,” the report stated. But segregation is just the tip of the iceberg. As well as Dalits being forbidden to worship in the same temples as other castes, from using the same wells, and drinking from the same cups, they are denied land that is legally theirs, made to perform degrading tasks and are often subjected to violence, including the rape of Dalit women.

Horen Tudu was born in Bangledesh into the Santhal tribal group but grew up in the USA. He is a researcher and staunch Pan Africanist who has written extensively about African descendants in the Indian subcontinent. Asked whether Dalits are aware of their African heritage, he told Black Britain: “I do believe that they are starting to understand that the upper caste function from the paradigm of the Indo Europeans and that the Dalits and the tribals themselves are indigenous and that the proto Australoids are African.”

But aside from the Dalits, India’s tribal groups make up another 84 million of its population. Tudu told Black Britain: “When you come to the tribals there is absolutely no controversy regarding the race of these people. They are clearly, physically, Africoid, they are linguistically distinct, religiously distinct; you can connect their spiritual systems to the spiritual systems in Africa – there is no ambiguity there.”


<A HREF="http://adserver.colourfulnetwork.net/a.aspx?Task=Click&ZoneID=4&CampaignID=121&AdvertiserID=3&BannerID=212&SiteID=1&RandomNumber=5388" TARGET="_top"><IMG SRC="http://images.colourfulnetwork.net/advertising/house/default.gif" WIDTH="468" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"></A>


Caste Discrimination affects black people everywhere

Maria Doss at a campaign in Norway.
“If they do employ Dalits it will be on less wages and there is no kind of interaction. Temples are separate; there is no inter-dining or inter-marriage.

Maria Doss from the Bhagwan Valmiki Trust in London
The Bhagwan Valmiki Trust (BVT) is a community organisation based in London which aims to promote development, education and awareness among the Valmiki community in the UK. A Dalit sub-caste, Valmikis are descendants of the sweeping class from the Punjab region of Non-Aryan groups including Greeks that came into the sub-continent. Because of their non-Aryan ancestry they were placed into the lower caste groups. They traditionally carry out menial and degrading jobs such as cleaning toilets, removing human excrement with their bare hands.

Maria Doss, a member of BVT told Black Britain that in India the relationship between Africans and Dalits is really only known among the “intelligentsia” , as opposed to the majority of Dalits who are uneducated. He said they had “lost their cultural identity,” and see themselves as Indians rather than African descendants. But Doss said that he would welcome an alliance between Africans and Dalits to collectively fight against caste discrimination.

Discrimination against Dalits is not restricted to India and as Doss explained to Black Britain: “Is very much alive in the UK.” In July of this year, a report called: No escape: Caste discrimination in the UK , by the Dalit Solidarity Network outlined the extent to which caste discrimination manifests itself in the UK among Indian communities both at school and in the workplace.

Doss told Black Britain: “Even at the hospital where I work as a supervisor I can see clear caste discrimination between two groups.” One female worker aged 55 told Doss: “If my son marries from that caste my father will kill me.”

He told Black Britain: “That is why we say that caste discrimination is worse than racism, because it is violent and direct but hidden. You cannot see the enemy.” Yet higher caste Indians who are often in positions of power are able to exert control over the lives of Dalits living in the UK.

Doss told Black Britain: “If they do employ Dalits it will be on less wages and there is no kind of interaction. Temples are separate; there is no inter-dining or inter-marriage.” But he said that even among Dalits themselves there is little interaction. “Bhuddists look down on Ravidassis and Valmikis,” he said.

Doss told Black Britain: “I have been to many places, colleges, churches and ordinary places, campaigning against these issues…we know what we need and what we can do. We try to bring them (Dalits) together.”

BVT have been liaising with networks in India and is hoping to establish a Dalit reconciliation centre in the UK in order to unite the various Dalit sub-castes for the purpose of strengthening the Dalits as a whole to collectively fight the caste discrimination that affects them all. Black Britain asked Doss whether he felt it was important for Dalits to know their history and the origins of the caste system that put them at the bottom of society: “Yes it is very important for our movement,” he said.

Tudu pointed out that because of poverty among Dalits in the Indian subcontinent, it tends to be higher castes individuals who actually travel, but wherever they go their socio economic caste system travels with them. He told Black Britain in the USA the first wave of Indian immigrants never interacted with African Americans and: “Always treated them with contempt.”

The reason for the hostility is because: “They actually see the Anglo Saxons as super Brahmins or ultra high caste Hindus…within their perverse world view, in terms of social status, race and skin colour. So they have always had this irrational hatred towards the African Americans that the African Americans themselves do not really understand.”

Tudu went on to relay a familiar picture in the UK which has caused underlying racial tensions in Birmingham, London and other areas where Asians live in close proximity to Africans and African Caribbeans: “A lot of Indian shopkeepers and other Pakistani groups have come into the US, gone specifically into depressed urban areas and have made money off the local people and treated them very badly. You have to also understand that most upper caste Hindus view Africans, African Americans or African Caribbeans in the UK as untouchables. That’s a distinction that must be made.”

The important thing to note here is that it is not just Dalit immigrants from the Indian subcontinent who are victims of caste discrimination in the UK and USA but continental Africans, African Caribbeans and African Americans. Citing Hinduism as the basis for this discrimination, Tudu told Black Britain: “It is obsessed with racial purity and the keeping of the race separate in order to also endorse white supremacy.”




Caste Discrimination and White supremacy on the Indian subcontinent

Horen Tudu (centre) with other Santhals from the village of Dinajpur in Bangladesh
They actually see the Anglo Saxons as super Brahmins or ultra high caste Hindus…within their perverse world view, in terms of social status, race and skin colour. So they have always had this irrational hatred towards the African Americans...

Horen Tudu, Researcher and Pan Africanist
The legacy of the early Aryan invasion on the Indian subcontinent, much like chattel enslavement has left a legacy of obsession with skin colour. Tudu told Black Britain that Unilever markets a skin bleaching cream called: Fair and Lovely which he noticed on a recent visit to Bangladesh in a television advertisement: “They show this …girl with dark skin who can’t get a job, can’t get married, is doing poorly in her studies and all of a sudden she uses this bleaching cream and her life is much better – and they’re marketing this kind of stuff.”

Tudu said that the aim of marketing bleaching creams in the region is: “To destroy the self-esteem of the local people.” He branded Bollywood as “Openly racist…because they don’t allow anybody who is dark skinned in there and they are 100 per cent Brahmins.” Bollywood producers are “Ashraf Muslim ethnicities who are descendants of non-black people,” he said.

Tudu told Black Britain that Pakistanis are also non-black people closely related to people in the Middle East : “And also have contempt for Africans and blacks.” Upper caste Indians and Pakistanis have even gone to the extreme of creating their own ethnic group called Desi , because they are so desperate to believe they are Caucasians.

He told Black Britain: “I find this skin colour issue to be very debilitating, if you look at the psychological state of the indigenous people. They are being pounced on in every single way,they are really trying to destroy these people inside out [and] it’s very shameful.”

In Bangladesh dark skinned, short people assume a lowly status in society, despite the fact that 80 per cent of its population is of that appearance: “But you have individuals of foreign origin who are ruling the country and who are not indigenous to Bangladesh, but they are promoting their white supremacist ideals on the local people,” Tudu said.

Bangladeshi women suffer most from self-loathing and a lack of confidence, despising their broad, flat noses and fuller lips and comparing themselves less favourably to the fair-skinned women portrayed in Bollywood movies: “It’s very, very sad to see a group of people with so much self-hatred and so much of a lack of consciousness [because] they have no concept of their history,” he said.

One form of resistance chosen by Dalits as a means of escape is conversion to Buddhism, an action advocated by Dr B R Amdedkar, an Indian who was born into the Dalit castes who overcame discrimination to become a scholar, lawyer and architect of the Indian constitution as well as the political leader of the Dalits. He was also a Buddhist revivalist who advocated conversion to Buddhism as a means of escaping discrimination.

Diop suggested that Buddha was a black Egyptian priest who was driven out of the City of Memphis by Cambyses. Iniyan Elango, M.D, is the author of a book called Without Malice: The Truth About India . Elango suggests: “Gautama Buddha, the Black revolutionary who founded the egalitarian religion of Buddhism to counter and destroy the bigotry of Hinduism, was a Black prince. But the Hindus highjacked Buddhism and killed Buddhists in large numbers. The Buddhist missionaries fled to other parts of Asia and spread the message of the Buddha in China and other parts of Asia. Those indigenous Dravidians who were loyal to Buddha and resisted the caste system became the untouchable outcastes (Dalits).”

Horen Tudu concurs with this view describing Buddha as a tribal from north-east India: “He protested against this racism coming from the Brahmins and the Hindus and he created his own spiritual system that was for the black people and for the indigenous people there.” Tudu also feels that Hindus appropriate these indigenous beliefs, incorporating them into the Hindu system as a means of control by trying to pass off the Buddha as a Hindu god.

Speaking to Black Britain about the reason Dalits choose to convert to Buddhism, Doss explained: : “Today most Dalits feel that they should be Buddhists.” But many state governments in India have introduced legislation to prevent Dalits from converting.

Black Britain asked in what way converting to Buddhism would change the fortunes of the Dalits if they remain in the same caste even after conversion. He explained: “As a community of Buddhists together, they are quite different – very strong. It empowers them socially and economically and they would proudly say they are neo-Buddhists.” Doss admitted that whilst conversion to other religions “hasn’t helped” , conversion to Buddhism “is helping and creating an identity.”

Some Dalits, especially in Bangladesh have turned to Islam because of its absence of caste and to escape oppression whilst others have converted to Christianity, sometimes merging it with their indigenous beliefs.



The African influence on Dalit resistance

Given the fact that Dalits are closely related to Africans and that globally Africans are victims of caste discrimination (whether they are aware of it or not) makes them natural allies in resistance of it. Tudu told Black Britain: “If you go to Bangladesh, for example, you’ll find in various regions that you cannot distinguish those people from [Africans ]. You’ll see people darker and more physically African than any person in Sub-Saharan Africa.”

He also feels that in terms of the political development of Dalit organisations: ”I think you can compare these movements directly to the struggles of the African Americans in particular.” Since the 1970s resistance movements modelled on black pride have sprung up all over the Indian subcontinent including the Dalit Panther party, based on the Black Panthers which has several branches.

Tudu told Black Britain: “This kind of consciousness among the Dalits is making the upper castes and Hindu fundamentalist parties very scared.” He explained that many people are unaware that the Dalits are descendants of Indian tribals that fought against the Aryans who were later brought into the caste system by force.

But in terms of politicised Dalit groups: “They mentally function from this indigenous African paradigm.” Scholars like Runoko Rashidi who is US based is essentially the voice of the Dalits in the US. He has written several books on the subject, most notably African Presence in Early Asia.

Rashidi has worked with many African American scholars including John Henrik Clark as well as other prominent Dalit scholar activists such as V.T Rajshekar. Tudu explained: “There are quite a few Dalit intellectuals who are promoting this African centred belief. In fact, I believe all of them function from an African centred paradigm.”

Periyar E.V.Ramasamy is considered the father of the Dravidian Nationalist Movement and founder of Dravidar Kazhagam, the first Dravidian political party in India. He pioneered the idea of self-respect among Dalits: “That is, why should an indigenous person or black person within the Indian subcontinent accept low status within this Aryan supremacist framework? They should have self respect and promote their own identity,” Tudu told Black Britain.

Tudu believes that many radical elements in Dalit movements: “Were influenced by the struggles of African Americans,” but furthermore that the time is right for a resurgence of Pan Africanism to deal with white supremacy and the oppression of black peoples. Commenting on the way that Marcus Garvey was able to mobilise millions of Africans across the globe in the last century, he told Black Britain:

“We need something like that to unify the world’s oppressed and fragmented black masses. If you look at any country in the world, you’ll find that the poorest members of the society, the persons that have the lowest social status have African origin.”

This particularly applies to indigenous people such as the Africans on the western coast of Mexico who are descendants of slaves and the tribals in India and Bangladeshi who have become victims of oppression in their own country. Commenting on the upper castes in India Tudu remarked: “We regard these people as foreigners. I myself am a direct descendant of the indigenous people – black people of the Indian subcontinent and I consider those individuals to be foreigners and I see all African people worldwide as my brothers and sisters.”

Like Doss, Tudu is adamant that resistance and the solutions for black people lies in education of self: “I think the critical effort should be directed toward the education of [our] people. We need to have our own scholars doing this research [and] we need to resurrect our history. We have to know where we come from – all of us worldwide.”

Tudu told Black Britain that the ideology of Pan Africanism has a major role to play: “All of us can take credit for each other’s accomplishments and that we are one people. That is all African people are one united people, not fragmented based on language or tribe, we’re all the same.